Case Study: Migrating a Mid-Size SaaS to Consumption-Based Cloud — 45% Cost Savings (2026)
case-studymigrationcost-optimization

Case Study: Migrating a Mid-Size SaaS to Consumption-Based Cloud — 45% Cost Savings (2026)

PPriya Desai
2026-01-09
10 min read
Advertisement

We migrated a mid-size SaaS from VM-based hosting to a consumption-based cloud model. Here’s the 6-month playbook, what worked, and lessons about governance and query costs.

Case Study: Migrating a Mid-Size SaaS to Consumption-Based Cloud — 45% Cost Savings (2026)

Hook: Migrating to a new cloud model is disruptive. In 2026, consumption-based discounts make the move compelling — but only if you plan for observability, query costs and governance.

Background

A boutique SaaS with 30k monthly active users ran on VM-based infrastructure with heavy batch jobs and monolithic data stores. Rising costs and limited elasticity triggered a migration to a consumption model offered by a major cloud provider that introduced discounts in 2026 (Cloud Pricing Discount Update).

Migration goals

  • Reduce baseline and peak costs by optimising for duty cycles.
  • Improve operational resilience with serverless and managed services.
  • Maintain or improve SLAs and observability.

Playbook (6-month timeline)

  1. Discovery & baseline: map cost drivers and top queries. Use a query-cost benchmark kit to model projected spend (Benchmark Cloud Query Costs).
  2. Design: separate ingestion, transformation, and serving layers. Adopt materialised views for heavy joins.
  3. Pilot: migrate a single tenant to the consumption model and measure costs and latency.
  4. Rollout: phased migration using feature flags and automated rollback strategies.
  5. Optimise: apply governance and cost budgets in CI to prevent regressions.

Outcomes

  • 45% reduction in monthly hosting costs after four months.
  • Improved scaling during traffic spikes with no manual intervention.
  • Better visibility into cost per feature and per-tenant usage.

Key lessons

  • Model the discount tiers — discounts change break-even points; simulate them early (Consumption Discount Update).
  • Benchmark queries — without benchmarking, serverless costs ballooned for a few analytics paths; fixing these saved 12% of the overall bill (How to Benchmark Cloud Query Costs).
  • Governance matters — enforce budgets via CI and policy-as-code to prevent runaway functions.

Tools & references

We consulted migration playbooks and vendor case studies to prepare the migration strategy (Migrating from Paid to Free Hosting) and applied advanced automation to summarise cost diffs (Advanced Automation).

Governance: what we automated

  • PR checks that estimate monthly cost delta.
  • Automated SLO checks for critical endpoints.
  • Tenant-level cost dashboards and alerts.
'Migration is a product effort — plan like a feature launch, not a one-off lift and shift.' — Migration Lead

Actionable checklist for teams considering migration

  1. Run a cost benchmarking exercise for your top queries and services (Benchmark Guide).
  2. Model consumption discounts and run break-even scenarios (Discount Update).
  3. Pilot with a non-critical tenant and instrument observability end-to-end.

Conclusion: With planning and governance, many SaaS teams in 2026 found consumption-based clouds reduced costs and operational overhead. The trick is to model, pilot and enforce budgets continuously.

Advertisement

Related Topics

#case-study#migration#cost-optimization
P

Priya Desai

Experience Designer, Apartment Solutions

Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.

Advertisement